Anti-Choice South Dakota Legislators: Women Can’t Think on the Weekends?

Nick Wunder is a Policy Representative with NARAL Pro-Choice America.

Anti-choice politicians in South Dakota gained notoriety in 2011 by passing an extreme measure that forces a woman to submit to a state-mandated in-person lecture at an anti-choice crisis pregnancy center (CPC), wait 72 hours, and make three trips before getting abortion care.  Thankfully, a federal judge blocked the 2011 law from going into effect, but anti-choice state legislators keep trying to up the ante.  In 2012, they amended the law to make it even worse: now the law forces doctors to probe women about deeply personal topics, including her religious beliefs—even if against her will. Fortunately, again the courts enjoined it.

I didn’t think these anti-choice politicians could take it any further, but they proved me wrong.  Last week, South Dakota state Rep. Jon Hansen introduced HB 1237, a bill that would redefine the 72-hour forced delay to apply only to business days, so that weekends and holidays wouldn’t count toward the three-day waiting period. This demeaning bill assumes that women can make medical decisions that impact their lives only during business hours.  Apparently, on weekends and holidays women just can’t think for themselves.  It’s insulting.

This bill would put abortion care even further out of reach for women who already live in one of the most difficult states for reproductive-health services.  South Dakota has only one abortion provider, and in many cases, women must travel long distances for care.  It would have the worst effect on low-income women, rural women, and Native-American women, all of whom have the hardest time getting health-care services.  Facing a mandatory delay and a two-trip requirement, women also may need to take time off from work or school, and arrange for child care, transportation, and overnight stays.

I did the math:  in practice, this bill could mean delays of weeks.  Such a long waiting period could have serious consequences for women’s health, which we should all agree no one wants.  But apparently Rep. Hansen and his anti-choice allies don’t.

As NARAL Pro-Choice South Dakota Executive Director Alisha Sedor points out, HB 1237 perpetuates “antiquated and sexist views of women…by implying that they are unable to make decisions about their reproductive health-care if it isn’t a business day.”

This tone-deaf measure fundamentally misreads where South Dakotans stand on government interference in citizens’ private lives.  And I should know—I grew up on a third-generation family farm in the northwestern corner of the state. South Dakotans understand that politicians have no business interfering with a woman’s private health-care decisions. But you don’t have to take my word for it: South Dakota voters have twice rejected abortion bans at the ballot box. Anti-choice politicians just don’t get it.

Maybe that’s why the Rapid City Journal selected HB1237 as the “Odd Bill of the Week.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s